It’s a week after Easter, so here is one final post on the theme of resurrection.
History records many dying-and-rising saviors. Examples from the Ancient Near East that preceded the Jesus story include Tammuz, Osiris, Dionysus, Adonis, Attis, and Baal. Here is a brief introduction.
Tammuz was the Sumerian god of food and vegetation and dates from c. 2000 BCE. His death was celebrated every spring. One version of the story has him living in the underworld for six months each year, alternating with his sister.
Osirus was killed by his brother Set and cut into many pieces and scattered. His wife Isis gathered the pieces together, and he was reincarnated as the Egyptian god of the underworld and judge of the dead. He was worshipped well before 2000 BCE.
Dionysus (known as Bacchus in Roman mythology) was the Greek god of wine and dates to the 1200s BCE. The son of Zeus and a mortal woman, Dionysus was killed and then brought back to life.
Adonis (from 600 BCE) is a Greek god who was killed and then returned to life by Zeus.
Attis (from 1200 BCE) is a vegetation god from central Asia Minor, brought back to life by his lover Cybele.
In Canaanite religion, Baal (Baʿal) was part of a cycle of life and death. Baal and Mot are sons of the supreme god El (yes, one of the names of the Jewish god). When El favored the death god Mot over Baal, the heat of the summer took over and Baal died. He was resurrected when his sister-wife kills Mot.
All these gods:
- came from regions that were close enough to the crossroads of Israel (Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and Asia Minor) for the ideas to have plausibly made it there,
- were worshipped well before the time of Jesus, and
- were of the dying-and-rising sort.
This is strong evidence that the gospel writers knew of (and could have been influenced by) resurrecting god stories from other cultures.
Is it possible that Judea at this time was a backwater, and the people were unaware of the ideas from the wider world? That seems unlikely. The book of 2 Maccabees, written in c. 124 BCE, laments at how Hellenized the country was becoming. It says that the new high priest installed by Seleucid king Antiochus Epiphanes “at once shifted his countrymen over to the Greek way of life.” He “introduced new customs contrary to the Law” and “induced the noblest of the young men to wear the Greek hat.” The book complains about “an extreme of Hellenization and increase in the adoption of foreign ways” and the youth “putting the highest value upon Greek forms of prestige.”
In fact, the gospels themselves report that the idea of dying and rising again was a familiar concept. Jesus in the early days of his ministry was thought to be a risen prophet.
King Herod heard of [the ministry of Jesus], for His name had become well known; and people were saying, “John the Baptist has risen from the dead, and that is why these miraculous powers are at work in Him.” But others were saying, “He is Elijah.” And others were saying, “He is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.” But when Herod heard of it, he kept saying, “John, whom I beheaded, has risen!” (Mark 6:14–16)
One Christian website does a thorough job attacking poorly evidenced parallels between Jesus and these prior gods. For example, was Dionysus really born to a virgin on December 25? Did Mithras really have 12 disciples? Was Krishna’s birth heralded by a star in the east? The author offers $1000 to anyone who can prove that any of these gods’ lists of parallels are actually true.
I’ll agree that there are strained parallels. One early work that has been criticized for too many claims and too little evidence is The World’s Sixteen Crucified Saviors by Kersey Graves (1875). The recent “Origins of Christianity and the Quest for the Historical Jesus Christ” by Acharya S also seems to be reaching, in my opinion.
I don’t have the expertise to weigh in on these many issues, so let’s grant the complaints and dismiss the many unsupportable specific parallels. What’s left is what really matters: that the Jesus story arose in a culture suffused with the idea of dying and rising saviors.
Apologists raise other objections.
Many of these gods actually came after Jesus. That’s why the list above only includes dying-and-rising gods who are well-known to have preceded Jesus. There are many more such gods—Mithras, Horus, Krishna, Persephone, and others—that don’t seem to fit as well. In fact, Wikipedia lists life-death-rebirth deities from twenty religions worldwide, but I’ve tried to list above the six most relevant examples.
But Jesus really existed! He’s a figure from history, unlike those other gods. Strip away any supernatural claims from the story of Alexander the Great, and you’ve still got cities throughout Asia named Alexandria and coins with Alexander’s likeness. Strip away any supernatural claims from the Caesar Augustus story, and you’re left with the Caesar Augustus from history. But strip away the supernatural claims from the Jesus story, and you’re left with a fairly ordinary rabbi. The Jesus story is nothing but the supernatural elements.
Most of those gods were used to explain the cycles of the seasons. Jesus isn’t like them. Christianity is different from all the other religions, just like any religion. If Christianity weren’t different from one of the earlier religions, you’d call it by the name of that religion.
In another post I explore the Dionysus myth more fully to show the parallels with the Jesus story. That post also notes how Justin Martyr (100–165 CE) not only admitted to the similarities but argued that the devil put them in history to fool us.
Okay, they’re all myths, but the Jesus story is true myth. This was the approach of C.S. Lewis, who said, “The story of Christ is simply a true myth; a myth working on us in the same way as the others, but with this tremendous difference, that it really happened, and one must be content to accept it in the same way, remembering that it is God’s Myth where the others are men’s myths.”
So you admit that the Jesus story indeed has many characteristics of mythology but demand that I just trust you that it’s true? Sorry, I need more evidence than that.
And the throw-in-the-towel argument:
Just because Christianity developed in a culture that knew of other resurrecting gods doesn’t mean that Jesus wasn’t the real thing. Granted. But “you haven’t proven the gospel story false” isn’t much of an argument. Those who seek the truth know that proof is impossible and try instead to find where the evidence points.
And here’s where the evidence doesn’t point: that humans worldwide invent dying-and-rising saviors (except in the Jesus case, ’cause that one was real!).
Photo credit: Wikipedia
- Jonathan Talat Phillips, “Gnosis: The Not-So-Secret History of Jesus,” Huffington Post, 1/7/12.
- Acharya S, “The Origins of Christianity and the Quest for the Historical Jesus Christ,” Stellar House Publishing, 2011.
- “Dying god,” Wikipedia.
- “Jesus Christ in comparative mythology,” Wikipedia.
- “Were Bible stories and characters stolen from pagan myths?” Tekton.
- “Was Jesus Christ just a CopyCat Savior Myth?” Christian Thinktank.
- Comparison of the traits of the Jesus story against those of Dionysus, Osiris, Tammuz, and Baal at Religion is Dumb.
- “Pagan Origins of Christianity?” Answering Islam.
- “Mystery Religions—Isis, Osiris, Dionysos, Orpheus,” AskWhy!
- “Mystery Religions—Tammuz and Adonis, Attis and Cybele,” AskWhy!
An interesting read on this subject is Dr. Bart Ehrman’s new book “Did Jesus Exist?” He points out that there are many problems with the idea that Jesus is just another dying-and-rising savior. The significant thing is that people like Paul in the first century thought of Jesus as the crucified Jewish messiah. He was not thought of as a god at all in early Christianity. Those dying-and-rising saviors were all gods. Jesus, early Christians thought, was the Jewish Messiah who quite unexpectantly was crucified.
Also, be careful about saying that each of these gods died and rose from the dead. Just because Kersey Graves said it does not make it so. Modern scholarship questions this view. Each god’s story is a little different. Osiris, for example, was murdered and his body was cut up and scattered. But his wife, Isis, went on a search to recover the pieces and she reassembled his body. But was he really alive at this point? In the remainder of the story of Osiris, he is the ruler of the dead in the underworld. So he apparently did not rise from the dead.
I think that the best way to discount Jesus is to point out that the gospels show him predicting many things that he said would happen in “that generation” that did not happen. In modern biblical phraseology, he was a failed apocalyptic prophet.
I’ve heard a lot of buzz about Ehrman’s new book, but I didn’t know it addressed the issue of other dying and rising saviors.
That’s an interesting take. Still, I think that the popularity of the dying-and-rising theme within the Greek world might have been the source of the idea within Christianity.
I mentioned Graves only to reject it. I haven’t read that book.
This is a damning factor for me as well.
I have read Graves’s book, and it’s a blast — but utterly without supporting documentation. Had it been making the case for the guys on the OTHER side of the issue, they would have elevated it to the status of revelation or hadith by now and claimed that it didn’t NEED further documentation.
Pingback: the rebirth of God « power of language blog: partnering with reality by JR Fibonacci
Pingback: Human Entitlement
Pingback: ‘The Exodus’ movie may not be accurate at describing… what? | The Lightblue Ribbon