Don’t Move the Goalposts

Moving the goalposts is a logical fallacyChristian apologists often bring up unresolved scientific questions and usually conclude with, “Well, if you can’t answer that question, Christianity can!  God did it.”  For example:

  • Why is there something rather than nothing?
  • What came before the Big Bang?
  • Why does the universe look fine-tuned for life?
  • How did life come from nonlife?

Admittedly, there is no scientific consensus on these questions.  But a century ago, Christian apologists pointed to different questions if they wanted to put science in the hot seat: Okay, Science, if you’re so smart, how is heredity transmitted?  What causes cancer?  What caused the universe?

And centuries before that, Christianity asked, What causes lightning?  Disease?  Drought?  Earthquakes?  It used these questions to argue that Christianity had answers that science didn’t.

Not only is science the sole disciple that could provide answers, increasingly only science can uncover the questions.  That is, the apologist pretends to inform science of questions that science discovered itself.

If in hindsight “God did it” was a foolish resolution for the questions of previous centuries—the cause of lightning and disease, for example—why offer it now?  Why expect the results to be any different?  Wouldn’t it be wise to learn from the past and be a little hesitant to stake God’s existence on the gamble that Science will finally come up short?

What’s especially maddening is apologists like William Lane Craig putting on an imaginary lab coat and ineptly fiddling with beakers and turning dials, playing scientist like a child playing house.  He imagines himself strutting into a community of befuddled scientists and saying with a chuckle, “Okay, fellas, Christianity can take it from here” and seeing them breathe a sigh of relief that the cavalry has finally come to bail them out of their intellectual predicament.  He imagines that he can better answer questions that his discipline couldn’t even formulate.

This reminds me of the fable about Science scaling the highest peak of knowledge.  After much difficulty, Science finally summits and is about to plant his flag when he looks over and sees Theology and Philosophy sitting there, looking at him.  “What took you so long?” one of them says.  “We’ve been here for centuries.”

Uh, yeah, Theology and Philosophy can invent claims, but Science does it the hard way—it actually uncovers the facts and makes the testable hypotheses.  It gets to the summit step by step along the route of Evidence rather than floating there on a lavender cloud of imagination and wishful thinking.  Religion is like the dog that walks under the ox and thinks that he is pulling the cart.

To the Christian who thinks that science’s unanswered questions make his point, I say: make a commitment.  Publicly state that this issue (pick something—abiogenesis or the cause of the Big Bang or fine tuning or whatever) is the hill that you will fight to the death on.  Man up, commit to it, and impose consequences.  Say, “I publicly declare that God must be the resolution to this question.  A scientific consensus will never find me wrong or else I will drop my faith.”

If the Christian fails to do this (or rather, when he fails to do this), he then admits that when his cherished question du jour is resolved, he’ll discard it like a used tissue and find another in science’s long list of unanswered questions.  That is, he admits that this is just a rhetorical device, stated only for show, rather than being a serious argument.

He’ll just move the goalposts.  Again.

Photo credit: Graham Ballantyne

Related links:

6 thoughts on “Don’t Move the Goalposts

  1. Great article. Religionists who are certain enough (or stupid enough) about their faith to make a stand on their chosen issue would most likely not value scientific consensus, anyway. The devil is leaving false evidence around for us all the time, after all.

  2. the “universe” isn’t fine tuned for life, only earth would seem to be….so far.
    question regarding that and any supposed god’s omnipotence: could a god make life on a planet that couldn’t support life? no.
    fact 1. religious people are the ones that claim god made everything from nothing. to me, the “universe” is infinite, bound only by nothing –
    fact 2, nothing cannot exist. there never has been a time when only nothing existed….this is the existence of nonexistence. and asking why there is something rather than nothing (martin heidegger) is to ask for an intention on existence. they presume an intention. prematurely, because there must be something existing prior to an intention to design something out of it….

    since nothing cannot exist, the “universe” is boundless…it is infinite and eternal, even if its evolution means that its forms must fade away, giving birth to the new. asking for an intention is like asking where the universe came from. IT IS EVERYWHERE (and nowhere in particular)!!!! how can it come from somewhere when it is what creates AND occupies space and time, simply by unraveling (or passing forms – matter) itself? if we don’t know where it is, how can we conclude it ever moved from point a to point b, when it occupies all points? and if the big bang did in fact occur….what exactly did it explode into? nothing? great. nothingness explodes into nothingness and the universe is the result, and god caused it all. what a grand theory. makes far more sense to conclude the evolution of existence. just because WE try to see or create a reason for everything, doesn’t mean one exists a priori.

  3. Did you see the video about the Qur’an and ants? They take a scientific study about the communication system that ants use, and state that 2,000 years ago Muhammad spoke of ants talking to one another in some random Surah.

    They are using this as a literal example at the moment, while it fits, and soon enough will retract it as a metaphor when the science expands. The ‘holy’ books of each faith is a well-honed device that can dash and dart logic, evade scrutiny, and brainwash billions.

  4. Pingback: “God Did It” Explains Everything … or Maybe Not | Galileo Unchained

  5. Pingback: “God Did It” Explains Everything … or Maybe Not | Galileo Unchained

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s